How to Create an MVP with AI Tools

Article by:
Anna Polovnikova
10 min
With all these AI tools flooding the scene, it's no big surprise that startup founders are feeling more fired up than ever. They're increasingly asking themselves a pretty bold question: "Could I actually build an MVP without hiring a team?" And it's true, today's AI tech does allow solo entrepreneurs to create some part of their future product all on their own. But is it really that straightforward? Let's find out.

The race to launch a minimum viable product (MVP) is more intense than ever, and artificial intelligence is the ultimate accelerator. You have a groundbreaking app idea, and the promise of AI tools for software development suggests you could bring it to life with unprecedented speed. But what's the reality of using these tools when it comes to crafting that crucial first version of your product? Can these sophisticated algorithms help you build an MVP with AI, or is it a more complicated picture?

Now, many AI tools exist for coding (GitHub Copilot), design (Galileo AI), testing (CodiumAI), and more. Here, we break down whether these genuinely assist an entrepreneur, especially one without a deep technical background, in getting a lean MVP into the hands of users. 

The Pros and Cons of Building an MVP Using AI Tools

Using AI software for building an MVP is tempting. Many hope for faster development, lower costs, and easier code generation. The potential rewards are huge, but there are also challenges that could trip up your project.

The Pros and Cons of Building an MVP Using AI Tools

Pros of Using AI Tools for MVP Development

Remarkable speed (under optimal conditions) is a primary attraction. AI tools for development already generate initial code, draft UI mockups from textual descriptions, or propose database structures in less time than it would take manually. Uizard or Galileo AI, for example, aim to convert ideas into visual prototypes as fast as possible.

For coding, GitHub Copilot or Amazon CodeWhisperer are fast assistants that suggest code blocks and functions. A 2025 McKinsey report says that an AI-enabled product development approach helps automate many software engineering tasks. These tasks potentially get accomplished 7 times faster with tools like GitHub Copilot, allowing for rapid iteration based on user feedback.

Then, reducing manual effort can lead to lower initial development expenses. If AI handles foundational coding tasks, project setup, or early-stage test case generation, your budget can stretch further. Many free app MVP builders provide an entry point to explore these benefits, making a minimum viable product with AI a more feasible option for startups with limited capital.

Greater accessibility for design and prototyping is another perk. For founders who aren't coders or designers, AI tools can lower barriers. Describing your app's concept can yield user flows, UX wireframes, or basic interactive prototypes. So you can clearly communicate your vision before deep technical work begins.

Plus, if you're facing a creative block or exploring different solutions for a feature, LLMs such as ChatGPT or Claude are valuable brainstorming aids. You just present a problem, and they offer various approaches, user stories, or flag potential issues. The capacity for quick idea generation and variation can enhance the iterative product development cycle essential for MVP success.

And we all know that certain aspects of software creation are repetitive: generating documentation, creating unit tests for straightforward functions, or translating interface text for different locales. AI offers substantial relief here, so that human developers can concentrate on intricate logic and innovative problem-solving. Mintlify for documentation or CodiumAI for test generation are focused on these areas.

Cons of Using AI Tools for MVP Development

But let's not forget about the "input quality dictates output quality" principle. AI systems, however advanced, rely on the clarity and precision of your instructions. Ambiguous prompts, poorly defined requirements, or a flawed understanding of the core problem will likely result in AI-generated outputs that are equally flawed, like code that looks functional but contains errors, security gaps, or inefficiencies. This means AI tools for development amplify the quality of the input, for better or worse.

The "black box" is another issue, which imposes further debugging challenges. When AI-generated code fails or behaves unexpectedly, diagnosing the root cause gets difficult. This opacity can lead to multiple MVP mistakes, as understanding the AI's decision-making process is often unclear, and you risk spending much more time debugging than if the code had been manually written with clear intent.

On top of that, the idea that one can simply instruct an AI to "build my app" is an oversimplification. While some app MVP builder platforms are integrating AI, creating a successful MVP still demands a solid grasp of product strategy, user experience design, and market viability. AI cannot confirm your product hypotheses, nor can it ascertain market demand.

As well as it cannot build on top of what you asked and go the extra mile to generate something unique. If many developers use similar AI tools with common prompts, there's a potential for MVPs to lack distinctiveness. AI models learn from existing data, which can sometimes lead to outputs that feel derivative. Your unique application concept might appear less original if you rely on standardized AI-generated elements.

Another side of oversimplification is the nearly functional deception, when AI gets you a significant portion of the way to a feature very fast. However, the final percentage, requiring deep insight, nuanced logic, and polish, is the most challenging. You risk getting an MVP that almost works, which can be more detrimental than a clearly unfinished product with a solid functional core.

Last but certainly not least, feeding proprietary code or sensitive business information into third-party AI tools raises questions about data security and usage. The recent report outlines risks such as prompt injection and data leakage. Many generative AI tools for software development are cloud-based, which is why you need a thorough review of their data governance policies.

Need a hand with your MVP?

Upsilon can help you plan and develop an MVP that'll grow to be a success!

Let's chat

Need a hand with your MVP?

Upsilon can help you plan and develop an MVP that'll grow to be a success!

Let's chat

How to Build an MVP Using AI for Software Development

If you're committed to taking advantage of artificial intelligence for your solution, you still need a methodical process, even if the MVP tool will take up a major part of the job. The rule is: use AI for software development in this context to augment human skill, not replace it.

So, you'll likely go through the process of building an MVP with AI software in five phases.

How to Build an MVP Using AI for Software Development

Phase 1: Intensive Brainstorming

Before defining and prioritizing features, you need to deeply understand the problem you're addressing. AI research tools (e.g., Perplexity AI or Consensus) can help with this and analyze market intelligence, competitor activities, or user feedback. They can definitely scan forums, reviews, and social media to identify common pain points and formulate a clear product problem statement much faster than a human being.

Then, consider features. Use an LLM like ChatGPT or Claude for broad brainstorming. Prompt them with something like:

"For an app targeting [audience] to solve [problem], list 20 potential features."

Though always apply human judgment (perhaps aided by further AI prompts) to distill these down to the absolute minimum set required for a viable product. Ask:

"Which features most directly solve the core problem with minimal complexity?"

If you haven't defined your target user yet, AI can assist in creating detailed user personas based on demographic data and psychographic insights.

"Develop three distinct user personas for a peer-to-peer equipment rental app."

This will inform your UX/UI decisions.

Phase 2: From Rough Ideas to Digital Mockups

If you have a basic concept for your UI, Uizard or Visily.ai can transform your sketches or textual descriptions into digital mockups and early product prototypes. Yes, they are not always pixel-perfect, but they give a strong starting point for design iterations. Your prompt can sound like this:

"Generate a UI for a mobile fitness app's main screen, including a summary of daily activity, a quick start button for common workouts, and navigation to a progress tracking section."

Some platforms are employing AI to assist in creating user flows or suggesting UI enhancements, too. Figma and Adobe XD also feature plugins that use artificial intelligence for tasks like populating designs with placeholder content or proposing layout optimizations.

At this stage, you will finally get some tangible outputs.

Phase 3: Code Generation (and Management)

This is the domain of GitHub Copilot, Amazon CodeWhisperer, Tabnine, or Replit Ghostwriter. These tools autocomplete code, suggest entire functions, and even assist in translating code between languages.

Here's a simple example of how Copilot works. Typing a function signature such as async function fetchUserProfile(userId) will likely trigger Copilot to suggest the complete function body, maybe even including API calls or database interactions, based on your project's context.

You can also use ChatGPT for logic:

"Draft a JavaScript function that sorts an array of objects by a specific property, and include error handling for missing properties."

At this stage, you will need to master your prompting skills so that you don't have to debug every single function later on. Some tips are:

  • Craft specific and context-rich prompts. This is a key aspect of the best practices for using AI in software development.

Bad prompt: "Create a login form."

Good prompt: "Generate HTML, CSS, and JavaScript for a responsive login form. Include fields for email and password, a 'Forgot Password' link, and client-side validation for email structure and password complexity (minimum 10 characters, including uppercase, lowercase, number, and special character)."

  • Describe your data entities and their relationships to an LLM model and request suggestions for a SQL schema or a NoSQL document model.

Good prompt: "Propose a PostgreSQL schema for an eCommerce application with products, customers, orders, and order items. Include relationships and primary/foreign keys."

  • If your MVP needs to integrate third-party APIs, AI can generate the initial code for making requests and processing responses.

Good prompt: "Provide Python code to interact with the Stripe API to create a new customer and process a one-time payment."

As you can see, using AI software requires much coding knowledge, even if it's just theoretical. You will still need to make decisions about the tech stack, logic, and compile the whole thing.

Phase 4: Quality Assurance

After you have your code ready, CodiumAI or Diffblue Cover (for Java) can analyze your codebase and generate unit tests. With them, you will achieve good baseline test coverage, especially for well-encapsulated functions. Today, this particular area is seeing rapid advancement among AI MVP builders.

While AI may not pinpoint every defect, you can provide error messages or problematic code sections to an LLM and request explanations or potential solutions.

"My Node.js application is throwing a 'TypeError: Cannot read property 'name' of undefined'. Here is the stack trace and the relevant code. What are the common causes for this?"

Post-launch, AI-driven sentiment analysis tools can rapidly process user feedback from reviews, social media, or surveys. You can use the output for prioritizing bug fixes, feature enhancements, or other adjustments to your MVP.

Phase 5: Refining and Launching

Creating and maintaining documentation is time-consuming, but Mintlify or Stenography are designed to assist by generating documentation from code comments or by analyzing the code structure.

You can ask an AI to help draft basic scripts for your continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipeline.

"Write a shell script for a GitHub Actions workflow that builds a Docker image for a Python FastAPI application and pushes it to Amazon ECR when changes are merged into the main branch."

The consistent theme throughout these phases must be: AI generates, human validates. Never implicitly trust AI-generated output. Thorough review, QA testing, and understanding of the code or content are non-negotiable. The tools will just do their job: assist you in creating something that matters to your users.

7 MVP App Builder Solutions and Tools

The number of AI tools for development is overwhelming, and there's growing competition, especially in the US. To ease things up, we've made up a list of some of the best AI tools for software development that are particularly useful for building MVPs.

MVP App Builder Solutions and Tools

1. Code Builders: GitHub Copilot / Amazon CodeWhisperer / Tabnine

These are AI-powered coding assistants integrated into your IDE. They provide code completions ranging from single lines to entire functions, based on project context and comments. When used for MVP development, they accelerate the writing of boilerplate code, common utility functions, and help developers learn new frameworks by observing suggested implementations.

But it's critical to review, ideally, every single line of code, as suggestions can sometimes be outdated or contain subtle bugs. Pricing for them varies, and some offer free tiers for individual or open-source use.

2. Brainstormers: ChatGPT (OpenAI) / Claude (Anthropic)

Brainstormers are versatile Large Language Models (LLMs) accessible through web interfaces or APIs. They are useful for:

  • ideation;
  • drafting user stories;
  • generating pseudocode;
  • explaining technical concepts;
  • writing marketing copy for landing pages;
  • creating sample data;
  • debugging code snippets.

Going for such tools is a leading option among the best generative AI tools for software development due to the flexibility. Like with code generators, however, they can occasionally produce inaccurate information ("hallucinations"). All code suggestions require careful validation as these are general-purpose models.

Many providers give free AI tools for software development access at a basic level.

3. Designer Tools: Uizard / Galileo AI

AI-driven UI design tools like Uizard transform sketches, screenshots, or text prompts into digital mockups and generate some basic front-end code (React, Vue, HTML/CSS). Galileo AI, for example, specializes in generating UI from text.

This means you can enable rapid creation of visual prototypes and initial UI elements, which is really beneficial for non-designers or for exploring different MVP design options.

Again, note that the generated code serves as a starting point and often needs refinement for a production-grade minimum viable product.

4. Code Managers: Replit Ghostwriter / Figstack

Replit Ghostwriter is an AI coding assistant within the Replit online IDE, aiding in code generation, transformation, and explanation. Figstack is a broader utility that explains code in natural language, translates between programming languages, and generates documentation.

They are helpful for understanding unfamiliar codebases, generating utility functions, or getting explanations for error messages. But the accuracy of explanations varies with code complexity. So, always cross-verify.

5. Testing Tools: CodiumAI / Testim Create (with AI features)

CodiumAI analyzes code and generates meaningful unit tests and code explanations, and Testim employs AI to assist in creating, executing, and maintaining end-to-end UI tests. Both are very useful for establishing baseline test coverage for core logic and ensuring critical application paths function as they should.

AI-generated tests are a good foundation, but it's not a good idea to replace thoughtfully designed human-written MVP tests for complex scenarios or edge cases.

6. Low-Code Platforms: Bubble / FlutterFlow (with AI Integrations)

These low-code or no-code MVP platforms are taking advantage of AI to enhance development speed by generating page layouts from descriptions, assisting with database logic, or suggesting application workflows.

If you want to build an MVP with AI with minimal direct coding, these platforms, augmented by AI, can deliver a functional application relatively quickly. But keep in mind that users operate within the platform's constraints. So, customization and scalability might see limitations for more complex applications.

7. Research Tools: Perplexity AI / Consensus / ChatGPT / Gemini

These AI-powered search engines and research assistants give summarized answers, often with citations. Consensus has a specific focus on academic research. They are valuable for market research, understanding technical concepts, finding data to support an MVP's value proposition, and competitor analysis.

It's likely you've already used at least one of these in your daily tasks, so you might know that you need to always verify sources. Information can sometimes be outdated or misinterpreted by the AI.

Want a quality MVP right on your first try?

Upsilon's expert team can help plan, build, and scale your product!

Let's talk

Want a quality MVP right on your first try?

Upsilon's expert team can help plan, build, and scale your product!

Let's talk

Final Say on Building an MVP with AI Tools

So, can you create an outstanding MVP relying solely on today's AI tools for development? If you are an experienced developer, AI can undoubtedly enhance your workflow, automate routine tasks, and enable faster iteration cycles. And the results can be impressive.

However, if you are a non-technical founder lacking a foundational understanding of product management, design principles, or basic programming logic, AI tools by themselves are unlikely to produce a high-quality functional MVP. You might generate something, and it might even appear complete at first glance. But it could also be an unstable and unreliable product, a poor-quality MVP.

Rather than wrestling with prompts and hoping an AI truly captures your vision, consider partnering with a digital product studio like Upsilon. We've guided dozens of clients through the critical initial stages of product creation, skillfully transforming concepts into tangible, market-ready solutions.

We know how to combine lean methodologies with solid engineering practices to ensure your MVP is developed to a high standard. We also use the best AI tools for development, where beneficial, always under the guidance of human expertise, to deliver a superior MVP efficiently and affordably.

Got a project in mind? Upsilon is ready to help. Our custom MVP development services are specifically designed to bring your early product version to life. We'll be glad to share our expertise and help you build a high-quality MVP in under 3 months. So, feel free to reach out to discuss the details!

scroll
to top

Read Next

How to Enhance Cybersecurity in Generative AI Solutions
AI

How to Enhance Cybersecurity in Generative AI Solutions

12 min
Collecting Product User Feedback: Best Practices for Startups
Product development, Building a startup

Collecting Product User Feedback: Best Practices for Startups

14 min
How Long Does It Take to Build an App?
Product development

How Long Does It Take to Build an App?

14 min